Sound Shore

New Rochelle, Larchmont, Mamaroneck, Rye, Port Chester, Pelham and Harrison


Village board considers broader idling ban

Posted by: Colin Gustafson - Posted in Mamaroneck, Uncategorized on Feb 28, 2011

MAMARONECK — It may soon be a crime to keep your car running for more than three minutes on a village street.

The Board of Trustees this month is considering the measure intended to reduce carbon dioxide and other emissions that damage local air quality and pose health risks to residents.

The board on Monday night agreed to hold a public hearing on the anti-idling ban at its March 14 meeting.

“You shouldn’t be leaving your motor running,” Trustee Toni Ryan said in an interview. “It’s not good for the environment, and it’s not good for … people with respiratory problems.”

Local law currently prohibits idling on village-owned property, with exemptions for emergency workers and vehicles with engines that are used to operate loading or processing devices.

The new legislation broadens the ban to drivers idling on a “street, road or highway” in the village. It also exempts vehicles “engaged in official government business” such as postal vans. There is also an allowance for buses that are kept running when the outdoor temperature drops below 40 degrees.

The county Board of Legislators approved a similar anti-idling law back in 2008, but the new bill before the village board gives local police more flexibility in how strictly they enforce the ban.

The village legislation is based on recommendations from the Committee for the Environment, an advisory body to the village board that recently raised concerns about buses idling near schools and trucks kept running near local businesses.

Trustee John Hofstetter said the new anti-idling ban is not meant to be punitive.

“We don’t want tickets as soon as this law goes into effect, and we don’t want police to crack down on people,” he said. “It’s to give people a warning.”

The American Lung Association last year gave Westchester’s air quality mostly poor and failing grades, based partly on the high levels of ozone, a pollutant that can damage the respiratory system.

 
 
 
Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Advertisements

3 Responses to “Village board considers broader idling ban”


  1. THE_MAD_BOMBER

    IT WOULD BETTER IF ALL THE OLD CRATES THAT DO NOT HAVE THE OBD 2 SYSTEM WERE BANNED FROM THE ROADS. CARS THAT HAVE THAT RUN SO CLEANLY YOU COULD BREATHE THE EXHAUST & BE OK.

  2. Ossining

    Doesn’t the county already have that law on the books and wouldn’t that cover Mamaroneck?

  3. GasGuzzler

    What a waste of time random joke of a law. The police should have better things to do with their time. The internal cumbustion engine powered by gas is still the cheapest most efficient power available. Good luck with the electric etc.. Where is all the power for charging going to come? duh. madbomber you live in fantasy world



Leave a comment using your facebook account

or leave a comment below

Search this blog

Advertisement

  • Place an ad

    Call (914) 696-8587.

    Media Kit

    Recent comments

  • Mike Levinson: I did NOT shout, scream or yell my words in the House of Representatives Chambers. I simply spoke the...
  • Horizon at Fleetwood: It’s great to see that there are still romantics and so close by. We love this story of...
  • Jan Northrup: I attended the Rye Neck Board of Education meeting last night, Wednesday, February 15. Much to my...
  • Peter Fellows: My own research suggests that the Gedney Farmhouse probably dates back to BEFORE 1770. Gedney’s...
  • DDP: Congratulations are in order for both the Village of Port Chester, Restaurant Depot and Whole Foods for having...

Advertisement

 

The Express

For more news and photos from your region, enjoy the EXPRESS section in The Journal News every Thursday and Sunday.